Don't Be Fooled Again by the Worst Stock in the Movie Business
August 12, 2010By: Frederick M. SteierArticles RSS feedPrintPrint

I've been investigating fad stocks lately, and thought one article might be enough, until I came across such a perfect example, I thought investors absolutely had to know about it. [See: 3 "Fad" Stocks That Collapsed. . . and the Next One To Fall]

We often learn more about investing from our mistakes than our winners, and this stock has already made fools out of a lot of investors. And it's setting up to do it again.


The movie business is, by and large, a terrible place to invest your money, unless you're dealing with a diversified media company like Walt Disney (NYSE: DIS) or a company with a proven track record like Dreamworks Animation (NYSE: DWA). [See: This Movie Stock is Following the Playbook to Massive Returns]

In fact, the movie business defies a rule I generally invest by, which is to put money into the stocks of companies that provide industry leaders with goods and services.

Panavision, for example, was one of the leading movie camera companies for Hollywood when it went public in 1996 at $17 per share. After a brief run-up, the company eventually spent too much on acquisitions over the years and became way too overleveraged. The stock tanked and was eventually taken private at $8 a share, -67% below its IPO price.

Movie theatres have historically been too burdened with debt for their stocks to ever perform well, either.

To this list I'm adding IMAX Corporation (Nasdaq: IMAX). The company provides cameras that shoot in its proprietary large-screen format and, of course, digital projectors and screens for showing the movies in theaters.

IMAX doesn't make its money from the cameras, however. Hollywood does not shoot entire films in IMAX format. Instead, IMAX makes most of its money by leasing its systems to theatres and with maintenance and revenue-share contracts for re-mastering and distributing Hollywood releases in its special format.

The problem is there are only so many movie theatres that can convert into IMAX theatres. The company has about 430 systems in its network, but says it may top-out at 1,250 screens. Currently, 85% of the company's revenue backlog is generated by these orders. So what happens when the world is saturated with IMAX screens? No more leasing deals. That could be a huge problem, because about 30% of IMAX's $225 million in revenue comes from the sales/leases, and that 30% comprises a full 100% the company's net income.

But once all those screens get installed, won't IMAX's revenues soar from ongoing revenue-share deals from re-mastering and distributing films in its format?

Not likely. This is the fad aspect of IMAX. To compensate for poor content, studios and exhibitors have raised prices and relied on gimmicks like 3-D and IMAX to offset the past decade's trend of flat-to-lower admissions. IMAX just happens to be benefiting from Hollywood's desperation. And when this gimmick runs its course, IMAX will be left at the altar like a jilted lover.

Make no mistake, IMAX is just a gimmick. A re-mastered IMAX image is nothing special -- it's just bigger, and it gives an excuse to charge higher ticket prices. Next time you're at a movie theatre, ask random patrons if they would pay extra money to see a run-of-the-mill movie in IMAX -- even in a good economy. I bet nine out of 10 will say "no."

Another sign of a gimmick is when fake versions show up... and in IMAX's case, they have.

The company's dirty little secret is that some installations aren't true IMAX. The AMC theatre near my home, for example, simply stretched its screen to fit the auditorium, and re-mastered it in IMAX. The trick, though, is that screen is 25% the size of a true seven-story IMAX screen. It's fake IMAX, and moviegoers are beginning to realize it.

How many of these 1,250 screens the company expects to have will be true IMAX? Because those fake screens will not pull in the same kind of audience. Sooner rather than later, IMAX revenues from re-mastering and distributing Hollywood films will drop off. People don't like paying extra for to see a movie that isn't true IMAX, and they don't like paying extra for something once the novelty wears off, either.

Hollywood will find a new gimmick. Other companies that already have expertise in converting TV and DVD signals into new 3-D equipped televisions will be the next big wave. I don't see a big home market for IMAX. It isn't like Dolby (NYSE: DLB) -- which has become a necessity in the production of film sound production and exhibition.

From an investing perspective, we've seen this before with IMAX. In the late 1990s, the company produced spectacular documentaries that you would mostly find in museums. When it seemed like this format was really going to catch on and more locations installed IMAX screens, the stock took off. Eventually, people realized that the commercial prospects for IMAX films weren't compelling. The stock fell from a high near $30 to just $1 in 13 months, back in 2000-2001.



Investors had been fooled.

Since 2009, the stock has moved from $3 to almost $20. The problem, as I've pointed out, is that there's no fundamental reason for the stock rise. IMAX is an accidental beneficiary of Hollywood's desperation.

The company showed increasing net losses from 2006-2008. Now the company is making money, but it won't last. The stock will collapse again.

Don't get fooled again.

Action to Take --> Stay away from IMAX. In fact, short it. (The shares took a -6% beating in Wednesday trading alone.)

Great companies solve a problem that people have.
IMAX doesn't. Great companies take over markets. IMAX can't because the very nature of its product prevents that from happening. Soon the IMAX wave will pass and revenue will begin to fall again.

Frederick M. Steier
Contributor, StreetAuthority.com
Readers Of This Article Also Enjoyed...
  • 5 Buyout Targets for Quick Gains in 2012

    The backdrop for deal-making has never been better. With these five buyout candidates, at worst you'll own solid businesses for the long-term -- at best you'll score a quick gain.

  • 2 Below-Book Stocks with BIG Upside (and Limited Downside)

    In an uncertain economy, it pays to play defense. These two stocks are trading well below book value, giving investors a welcome downside protection -- but while still offering plenty of upside.

  • Now's the Time to Buy Small Caps -- Especially These 2 Stocks

    If history is any guide, then it's time to buy. Here are two of my top picks...

  • These 3 Companies Could be Headed for Bankruptcy in 2012

    According to Fitch Ratings Inc.,  corporate bankruptcies in 2012 are expected to double in number in number and size from their 2011 levels. Could these 3 companies be the first victims?

  • 3 Small-Cap Stocks with Heavy Insider Buying

    These "off-the-radar" plays might deliver solid upside in 2012. Here's why...

    •

    LEGAL DISCLAIMER: SmallStocks.com and its parent company, StreetAuthority, LLC, are publishers of financial news and opinions and NOT securities brokers/dealers or investment advisors. You are responsible for your own investment decisions. All information contained in our newsletters or on our web site(s) should be independently verified with the companies mentioned, and readers should always conduct their own research and due diligence and consider obtaining professional advice before making any investment decision. As a condition to accessing our materials and web sites, you agree to our Terms and Conditions of Use, available here, including without limitation all disclaimers of warranties and limitations on liability contained therein. Owners, employees and writers may hold positions in the securities that are discussed in our newsletters or on our web site.